Tunisia’s constitution will not be based on Sharia: Islamist party

Some Tunisians had voiced concern that the Islamist party would seek to curb women’s rights and other liberties in an Arab country known for its progressive laws.

Tunisia’s governing Islamist party said it will not support making sharia, or Islamic law, the main source of legislation in a new constitution and will maintain the secular nature of the state. 

Ennahda’s stance on an issue that has increasingly polarized the country since the January 2011 revolution was criticized by hardline Islamists who wanted full blown sharia but welcomed by secular parties.

Ennahda, which emerged as the biggest party after Tunisia’s first democratic elections last year, said on Monday it would keep the first article of the 1956 constitution in the new basic law now being drafted.

The article enshrines the separation of religion and state, stating that: “Tunisiais a free, independent and sovereign state, its religion is Islam, its language is Arabic and it is a republic.”

“We are not going to use the law to impose religion,” Rached Ghannouchi, leader of the moderate Islamist party, told a press conference.

Islam is Tunisia’s official religion and the constitution stipulates the president should be a Muslim but the state is largely secular.

Some had voiced concern that the Islamist party would seek to curb women’s rights and other liberties in an Arab country known for its progressive laws.

But Ghannouchi said Ennahda would not “introduce ambiguous definitions into the constitution that risk dividing the people”, adding that “manyTunisians do not have a clear image of sharia and erroneous practices in certain countries have aroused fear.”

The statement has angered Tunisia’s ultra-conservative Salafists, who have been pushing for sharia to be recognised as the main source of law.

At least 8,000 hardline Islamists staged a demonstration in central Tunis on Sunday to press their demands and Ennahda’s stance came as a disappointment Tuesday.

“This is a betrayal of all those who voted for this party … and the principles of the Islamist movement,” Hechmi Haamdi of the hardline Islamist Al-Arydha movement told AFP.

Progressive Democratic Party member Meher Hanin, however, said the announcement had “lifted the ambiguity” on Sharia’s place in the law.

“This will allow us to advance in the writing of the constitution,” said Hanin, whose party is in parliamentary opposition.

“Ennahda has made clear declarations; the secular character of the state is maintained. Now it must honor those commitments,” he added.

Mohamed Bennour, spokesman of Ennahda’s governing coalition partner Ettakatol, the Islamist party’s decision bolstered national unity.

“We hope they will suit actions to words,” he said.

Ghannouchi, an Ennahda founding member, had in the 1970s called for strict application of sharia in Tunisia to restore order in a society he said had become depraved.

But he has toned down his discourse in recent years.

A Muslim majority of more than 90 percent has lived peacefully for years with religious minorities, including Jews.

Published on 27 March 2012 by AFP, TUNIS
http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2012/03/27/203529.html

Union for the Mediterranean: Parliamentary Assembly calls for active role of women in the movements towards democracy

A political solution to the conflict in Syria, a resumption of the Middle East peace process and active role of women in the movements towards democracy  - these were the key wishes of the 8th Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM), held in Rabat (Morocco) on 24 and 25 March 2012. The European Parliament will now chair this Assembly for a year.

In plenary session, European Parliament President Martin Schulz, who led the EP delegation and will chair the UfM Assembly for the coming year, presented his priorities. “Our Assembly must mobilise to strengthen the role of newly-elected MPs and new parliaments. It must see that the needs of our fellow citizens are reflected in the activities of the Union for theMediterraneanand of the European neighbourhood policy. Pressing ahead with large projects that create growth and jobs is a priority. Furthermore, it must be acknowledged that the ‘Arab Spring’ has somewhat overshadowed the Middle East Peace Process. It is therefore vital to maintain conditions of dialogue and openness to enable our Israeli and Palestinian colleagues to take part in our work”, he said.

This meeting was the first to bring together MEPs and MPs newly elected on theMediterranean’s southern shore since the “Arab Spring”.

Situation in Syria and Middle East Peace Process

“It is urgently necessary to put an immediate end to violence in Syria and guarantee full and protected access to humanitarian assistance. Syria does not need military intervention, but a political transition led by Syrians” said Political Affairs Committee Chair Tokia  Saïfi (EPP, FR), echoing the recommendation approved in plenary session.

The parliamentarians stated their support for the mission of United Nations and Arab League special envoy Kofi Annan, to bring about a political solution to the crisis. They also expressed their support for, and solidarity with, the people and youth of Syria.

The resolution passed on Sunday calls on Israel to recognise the Arab peace initiative whilst  reiterating the importance and urgency of arriving a fair and lasting settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Supporting the transition to democracy

Support for the democratic process in the context of EU neighbourhood policy must foster the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary, the pluralism of the media, the fight against corruption and the strengthening of civil society, says the approved text.

The recommendations also reiterate the active role that young people and women play in movements towards democracy, and stress the need to involve them in the democratic transition.

Furthermore, to promote education and training for young people, parliamentarians call on the European Commission to take up the European Parliament proposal on the creation of Euro-Mediterranean Erasmus (student exchange) and Leonoardo Da Vinci (professional training) programmes.

To support the sourthern Mediterranean countries in their reform and decentralisation efforts, the Parliamentary Assembly advocates creating a Euro-Mediterranean investment bank, provided it is shown to be feasible.

EP Delegation – Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for theMediterranean

Martin Schulz, EP President and Chair of the delegation, François Alfonsi (Greens/EFA, FR), Kriton Arsenis (S&D, EL), Ines Ayala Sender (S&D, ES), Malika Benarab-Attou (Greens/EFA, FR), Vacilia Viorica Dancila (S&D, RO), Isabelle Durant (Greens/EFA, BE), Gaston Franco (EPP, FR), Vicente Garces Ramon (S&D, ES), Sajjad Karim (ECR, UK), Ioannis Kasoulides (EPP, EL), Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou (EPP, EL), Patrick Le Hyaric (GUE/NGL, France), Guido Milana (S&D, IT), Radvilé Morkunaitè-Mikulènienè (EPP, LT), José Maria Obiols Germà (S&D, ES), Pier Antonio Panzeri (S&D, IT), Antonyia Parvanova (ALDE, BG), Carmen Romera Lopez (S&D, ES), Tokia Saïfi (EPP, FR), Marie-Thérèse Sanchez Schmid (EPP, FR), Kyriacos Triantaphyllides (GUE/NGL, CY), Ivo Vajgl (ALDE, SL), Dominique Vlasto (EPP, FR).

Published on 26 March 2011 by European Parliament
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/pressroom/content/20120319IPR41161/html/UfM-Parliamentary-Assembly-calls-for-political-solution-to-Syria-conflict

Morocco: Girl’s Death Highlights Flawed Laws

Morocco should enact a meaningful law on domestic violence and repeal the penal code provision that in practice has allowed men accused of raping or having sex with minors to avoid prosecution if they wed their victims, Human Rights Watch said today. A 16-year-old girl apparently took her life on March 10, 2012, after entering a marriage under these conditions.

The death of Amina Filali in a village in northern Morocco has fueled a public debate around the controversial penal code article 475, including demonstrations inRabatand other cities, and extensive coverage in state and independent media. However, combating violence against women and girls inMoroccorequires not only abrogation of article 475 but a host of additional legal reforms that ease the obstacles to prosecuting rape and domestic violence, as well as policies to ensure that victims can get services they need, Human Rights Watch said.

“Article 475, as bad as it is, is only the tip of the iceberg in Morocco’s failure to protect women and girls from violence,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East andNorth Africadirector at Human Rights Watch. “Despite reforms in Morocco’s 2004 family code, girls and women are far from being protected under the law when they are the victims of violence.”

Since Filali’s death, Moustapha Khalfi, minister of communications, and Bassima Hakkaoui, minister of solidarity, women and the family, and the only woman among the 29 ministers in the government, are among the officials who have called for re-examining and possibly reforming article 475. However, the government, which was formed after November 2011 elections and is led by the Islamist Justice and Development Party, has not announced any plan to press for more comprehensive legislation on violence against women.

Filali’s parents, who live in the village of Qrindi, near Larache, had filed a complaint in 2011 before the Tangiers prosecutor, stating that Moustapha Fellak, who is about 25 and lives in the nearby village of Khemis Sahel, had raped their daughter. A doctor who examined her issued a report stating that she had lost her virginity but that the exam did not show evidence of rape, the girl’s mother, Zahra, told the Associated Press recently.

After reports in the Moroccan media that Filali had committed suicide by consuming rat poison, the Justice Ministry issued a statement dated March 16 saying that following the rape complaint, Filali had told the prosecutor that the sexual relations she had had with Fellak were consensual.

Her father, Lahcen Filali, petitioned the judge on September 19 to allow Filali to marry Fellak. At four sessions before a judge in the city ofLarache, Filali, in the company of her parents, confirmed her wish to marry him, the Justice Ministry statement said. Fellak said he wished to marry Filali and on November 30, the judge gave them his permission, and the prosecutor abandoned the rape investigation.

After their marriage in December, Filali and Fellak moved in with his family. Filali’s parents have told the news media that Fellak regularly beat their daughter and that her in-laws mistreated her. They told at least one journalist that on March 9, the day before she died, she had gone to the local post of the gendarmerie – the law enforcement agency in Morocco’s rural zones – to complain that her husband beat her, and was told that without a medical certificate showing physical injuries, the gendarmerie could do nothing.

Fellak and his parents, speaking to the media, have denied mistreating Filali, and a source at the gendarmerie post denied to a local activist that Filali had visited the post the day before her death. The Justice Ministry statement said the prosecutor is investigating the causes of the girl’s death.

Filali’s case highlights significant shortcomings in Morocco’s legal framework on domestic violence and rape, Human Rights Watch said.

Morocco has no specific law on domestic violence, although penal code provisions on assault and battery say that if the victim is a family member, including a spouse, it can be considered an aggravating circumstance for sentencing purposes (articles 404 and 414). The code criminalizes rape in article 486 and sexual acts with a minor “without violence” in article 484.

Article 475 provides for a prison term of one to five years for a person who “abducts or deceives a minor, under 18 years of age, without violence, threat or fraud, or attempts to do so.”However, the second clause of that article specifies that when the minor marries the man, “he can no longer be prosecuted except by persons empowered to demand the annulment of the marriage and then only after the annulment has been proclaimed.” That clause effectively prevents the prosecutor from independently pursuing rape charges.

Women’s rights activists inMorocco say that courts have applied article 475 in rape cases even though its wording envisions criminal exoneration only for nonviolent acts. Similar provisions exist in other countries in the Arab world.

“Article 475 not only reflects social mores harmful to women and girls, it reinforces them, with the judiciary presiding over the repression,” Whitson said.

The social origins of the exoneration clause in article 475 lie in the notion, prevalent in traditional milieus in Morocco, that an unmarried girl or woman who has lost her virginity – even through rape – is no longer marriageable and has dishonored her family. Some families believe that marrying the rapist or sexual partner addresses these problems. The prospect of avoiding prison induces the man to consent to marriage.

The Associated Press quoted Filali’s mother as saying, “I had to marry her to him, because I couldn’t allow my daughter to have no future and stay unmarried.”

The minimum legal age of marriage in Moroccois 18, but the family code allows a judge to authorize a minor to marry on the condition that both the minor and her guardian sign the request and the judge conducts an inquiry into the health of the minor(s) or their social situation, and explains the judge’s reason for approving the union.

Human Rights Watch has not found out whether the judge fulfilled these requirements before approving the marriage of Fellak and Filali, or how he determined that the 16-year-old girl’s consent was voluntary and informed.

Regardless of the facts in this case, women’s rights activists point to laws and practices that effectively provide men with impunity for violence against women and girls. The activists note, for example, that while nothing in the penal code precludes spousal violence from being prosecuted under the articles on assault and battery, the police tend to treat such complaints not as criminal matters but rather as problems to be resolved within the household. Such cases rarely reach the courts.

Another obstacle to combating domestic violence is article 496 of the penal code, which punishes anyone who “knowingly hides or subverts the search for a married woman who is evading the authority to which she is legally subject.” In effect, this provision is worded in such a way that it could be used against domestic violence shelters that women’s associations for years have been operating to aid battered women and girls, women’s rights activists say.

Rape victims also face obstacles and risks in pressing charges. A complainant risks prosecution herself if her accused rapist is acquitted, since the penal code criminalizes even consensual sex outside marriage. Moreover, her path to proving rape is complicated by the undue weight that Moroccan courts place on medical evidence in rape cases and their lesser regard for rape victims’ testimony.

For these reasons, Morocco should enact a series of reforms to combat violence against girls and women, Human Rights Watch said. Those reforms should include abrogation of penal code article 475, of article 490 criminalizing consensual sex between unmarried people, and of article 496 criminalizing the harboring of a married woman who leaves her husband. They should also include adoption of a law that defines and penalizes domestic violence, and instructions to prosecutors and judges to give victims’ testimony, and not just medical and forensic evidence, adequate consideration in the judicial process.

Previous governments publicly declared their intention to promulgate a law on violence against women that would address domestic violence. In December 2010, Nouzha Skalli, the minister of solidarity, women, family and social development in the previous government, told parliament that a 64-article bill on domestic violence was being drafted. However, a final draft has not been made public and its current status is not clear.

Morocco’s 2011 constitution obliges the government to reform existing laws to harmonize them with articles affirming the rights of women, Human Rights Watch said.Article 19 announces equal civil, political, economic, social, cultural, and environmental rights for men and women. Article 20 provides for the right to life, while article 21 provides for the right to personal security. Article 22 prohibits all violations of physical and moral integrity and dignity, as well as all cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment, whether committed by State or private actors.

“Laws alone cannot solve deep-rooted social problems,” Whitson said. “But without the adoption and enforcement of a legal regime that treats rape and violence against women always as serious crimes, there can be no hope of changing practices.”

Published on 23 Mar 2012 in Reuters
Source: Content partner // Human Rights Watch
http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/morocco-girls-death-highlights-flawed-laws

Reema Abdullah is a role model for Saudi women athletes

Aspiring to be the first Saudi woman to carry the Olympic torch is brave in a country that condemns female physical exercise. 

The first school I went to in Riyadh was, of course, an all-girls school. I was very happy to see it had a swimming pool. It was drained and fenced up and, because it was autumn, I thought nothing more of it. But as the weather got warmer, it became obvious that the pool would not be used that year.

 Members of theSaudi Arabia’s Jeddah United team in training. Photograph: Ali Jarekji/Reuters When I asked why, teachers told me it was against the ministry’s policies to allow female students to have swimming classes. Indeed, the education ministry does not allow physical education in girls’ public schools and discourages it in private schools – especially organised competitive sports – despite many calls for the inclusion of PE from parents, doctors, specialists and even Princess Adela, the king’s daughter, who is married to the minister of education.

It is not only policies that are standing between girls and physical education. There’s a whole culture behind this thinking that’s very difficult to shake, and many inSaudi Arabiafrown upon physical activity for girls. Their reasoning is that it’s masculine, that exercise would somehow result in girls losing their virginity and that it’s against the physiological nature of being a woman.

In eighth grade, a friend and I were called into the principal’s office to sign pledges to never do “acrobatic movements” during recess. A teacher had seen us do cartwheels in the schoolyard and had taken it upon herself to stop this unfeminine behaviour. In response to a question about private gyms for women, the highest Islamic council replied that it was “nonsense”, and that a woman’s place and responsibility is her home. Shiekh Abdullah al-Manea, a consultant to the royal court and a member of the highest Islamic council, stated that sports such as soccer and basketball could result in loss of virginity.

The nternational Olympic Committee (IOC) has criticisedSaudi Arabiafor being one of the last three countries to send female athletes to the Olympics, and there is no shortage of Saudi Islamic scholars weighing in: Shiekh al-Najimi advised that Saudis stand their ground against the IOC, as we did with the World Trade Organisation. He says that we refused the conditions that do not fit with Saudi culture and in the end, after 15 years of back and forth, we were admitted to the WTO on our own terms. He called the whole issue an issue of western dictatorship. Sheikh al-Tirifi sees it as a matter of honour, and reminds viewers that those who die defending their honour die martyrs. Currently, the most popular view of Saudi women in the Olympics is held by Sheikh al-Munijid, who reasons that there is no possible way for a Muslim woman to take part in the Olympics without showing her body.

With all this resistance coming from the religious establishment, it’s no wonder Prince Nawaf bin Faisal Al Saud, the youth and sports minister, said thatSaudi Arabiawould only send a men’s team to the London Olympics. “If there is to be women’s participation,” he added, “it would be by invitation” from international sporting bodies. Meanwhile, Saudi officials are said to have sent a list of potential female participants to the IOC.

It’s a confusing picture, but in Reema Abdullah we already have a Saudi woman who is unhesitating and proud to be an athletic role model for Saudi women. Abdullah, unlike the ministry, is very open about her participation in the London Olympics. It’s no surprise she’s taking the lead in her capacity asSaudi Arabia’s first female sports radio host, and as captain and one of the founding members of Jeddah United, the first public Saudi women’s football team. She is also one of the lucky few who will get to carry the Olympic torch on the 8,000-mile route toLondon. Instead of avoiding interviews and dialogue, she has bravely chosen to be open to everyone. She’s available on Twitter and even jokes about her aspiration to be included in the Guinness Book of World Records as the first Saudi woman to carry the Olympic torch.

By Eman Al Nafjan
Published on 26 March 2012 in Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/mar/26/saudi-arabia-reema-abdullah-olympics

Assad’s women

The Western sanctions, including the recent European Union (EU) sanctions targeting the head of the Syrian regime, Bashar Assad, and even his brother Maher Assad, were insufficient. The EU therefore took the decision to impose other sanctions on the women of the Assad family, including Bashar Assad’s mother, sister and wife. This represents a striking decision, for what does the imposition of these sanctions truly mean? What follows on from this?

It is clear that the latest European sanctions indicate that the international community — including Europe — has now decided, or shall we say admitted, that the problem in Syria today is not a tribal or a sect, but rather a single family, namely the Assad family, both men and women. Therefore the EU has taken the decision to target the Assad family women with sanctions, effectively pinning a target on this family and making it an objective for anybody who wants to topple the Assad regime, particularly the military.  The EU targeting the Assad family — and its women — in this manner is an implicit indication that the international community would give its blessings to a military coup taking place in Syria.

The sanctioning of the Assad family means thatEuropeand the international community is differentiating between the Assad family and the (Alawite) sect, as well between the family and Syrian Army officers.

These sanctions represent a clear message to Syrian Army officers, as much as they aim to suppress or intimidate the Assad family. This message is: Take action, and we will give you our blessing, because we differentiate between you and the Assad family. This is a message to all those capable of taking action within the Syrian Army, whether members of the Alawite sect or others; the important thing is that Europe is trying to tellSyria’s military officers that it distinguishes between them and the Assad family.

The irony is that the Assad family, which is the true ruler ofSyria— politically and economically — has never sought the spotlight, even though it is in control of the source of this light; however it today finds itself in the eye of the storm, in an unprecedented manner. The Assad family is the true ruler and governor ofSyria— as we mentioned before — not the Baathist party or anybody else;Syriais ruled by the Assad family council, and the women have a prestigious position in this.

This is something that the Europeans have become aware of, and they have therefore taken action to even sanction the women of this family. 

These sanctions will, of course, have a significant material impact; for the issue is not targeting a tribe or sect, but rather targeting a single family, which is something that should be clear for all Syrians — not to mention Syrian Army officers — to see. Therefore the question that must be asked today is: Who is prepared to sacrifice themselves for a single family? The story here is not about a country or regime or even tribe or sect, but rather the story of a single family.

The European sanctions today are like a target used for archery practice, so the question is: who will hit the bull’s-eye — namely the Assad family — in order to save themselves, and Syria as a whole?

Simply speaking, the European sanctions mean that either you are with Assad or you are withSyria; therefore these sanctions have even targeted the Assad family women.  This is a message that will be best received and understood by the soldier of the Assad regime; therefore there can be no doubt that the European sanctions represent a genuine and effective threat to the Assad regime. 

Published on 25 March 2012 in Arab News
http://arabnews.com/opinion/columns/article594711.ece
By Tariq Alhomayed, editor in chief of Asharq Al-Awsat
 
 
 
 

Arab women in Israel face double discrimination

As Israel raises the minimum age for marriage we should also, in honor of International Women’s Day, raise our solidarity, tolerance and understanding for Arab women, too.

In Israel, 17-year-olds are minors for all intents and purposes – except when it comes to marriage. This is not merely theoretical: Every year more than 4,500 Israelis aged 17 or younger marry. The vast majority – around 4,000 – are female. For this purpose, they are not minors. After all, they can already cook and clean; more important, their wombs and all the organs leading to them are ready.

The Knesset plenum is to vote today on a bill to raise the minimum marriage age from 17 to 18; there is still a danger that the ultra-Orthodox parties will scuttle it.

This is not the first time the proposal has been put forth; similar bills were submitted by MK Eti Livni (Shinui ) in the 16th Knesset and by MK Zahava Gal-On (Meretz ) in the 17th Knesset and MK Orit Zuaretz (Kadima ) tried to advance the idea two years ago. Under both prime ministers Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert the Ministerial Committee for Legislation refused to back the proposals the first two times, and Zuaretz did not even submit her bill to the committee.

But now, surprisingly, under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the Ministerial Committee for Legislation approved the bill, which means it goes to the plenum with government backing. How advanced and enlightened. Hurray!

You might be tempted to say that times have changed, that the bill’s day has come. But just one year ago the very same committee rejected the very same bill. How did it happen? Well, last year’s bill was submitted by MK Hanin Zuabi (Balad ), this year’s by MK Yariv Levin (Likud ).

This demonstrates two things. First, that all the bill needed was to be submitted by a man from the right, preferably the extreme right. Thus, in honor of International Woman’s Day a bill initiated by a series of female MKs (this time it was Gila Gamliel of Likud who did the honors ) gained approval only when it was submitted by a man. Happy International Women’s Day to us all.

The second lesson is no less important: that the exact same proposal that is treated like gold and immediately accepted when it comes from a right-wing Jewish man is treated like garbage and categorically rejected when the messenger is an Arab woman.

This may not sound earthshaking, but still. At a time when demonstrators call for expelling Zuabi from the Knesset, when an unprecedented number of Facebook members “like” a police complaint filed against her and she is verbally and physically attacked during a tour ofHebron, it’s something worth noting.

In our masculine society, women are inferior to men in terms of rights and opportunities and are still punished in a variety of ways when they don’t conform to “feminine” roles – being soft, gentle, motherly, sexy and generally weak.

A woman who does not fit this mold – who is not a mother, not married, not soft and not “nice” – and is Arab, to boot, with a strong Palestinian identity and who demands her civil and national rights, pays an infinitely greater price.

White women who aren’t obedient suffer plenty as they make their way toward their goals, whatever they may be, but what Israeli society somehow manages to tolerate from its white women it is less likely to tolerate from Mizrahi women; very few women MKs are of Middle Eastern descent. And what Israeli society tolerates from its Jewish women, so it can boast about being egalitarian, it certainly is unwilling to tolerate from its Arab women.

In fact, what Israeli society is willing to accept from Palesinian men it will not accept from Palestinian women. Thus, Zuabi is the target not only of vicious epithets like “terrorist” that not even former MK Azmi Bashara faced, but also of sexist remarks about still being single and living with her parents because no one wants to marry her.

There is a distinct link between the attitude toward Zuabi and the view of women as chattel that can be given in marriage, at any age, without consideration for their needs and desires. As we raise the minimum age for marriage we should also, in honor of International Women’s Day, raise our solidarity and tolerance and understand that an Arab woman, too, is a human being and has the right to dignity, to freedom of speech and to the pursuit of happiness.

Published on 6 March 2012 in Haaretz
By Merav Michaeli
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/arab-women-in-israel-face-double-discrimination-1.416749

 

Harassment of Union Leaders and Bans on Demonstrations Continue in Algeria

JOINT PRESS RELEASE: One year after the repeal of the state of emergency in Algeria, the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network (EMHRN) and the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders, a joint programme of the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT); their Algerian member organizations the Algerian League for Human Rights Defence (LADDH) and the Coalition of Families of the Disappeared (CFDA); as well as SOS-Disparus, the National Independent Union of Public Servants (SNAPAP) and the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies, are deeply concerned about the fact that human rights defenders, in particular union activists, remain the targets of harassment by the authorities.

On 26 February 2012, 40 members of the National Workers’ Committee on Pre-employment and the Social Net of the National Independent Union of Public Servants (Syndicat national autonome des personnels de l’administration publique, SNAPAP) were arrested during a sit-in demonstration staged in front of the Maison de la Presse in Algiers, where participants were calling for recognition of the rights of unemployed and casual workers. After being detained in the morning, the union leaders were released in the late afternoon without being charged. Among them were Malika Fallil, chair of the National Workers’ Committee on Pre-employment and the Social Net, and Tahar Belabès, spokesperson for the National Coordination for the Defence of the Rights of the Unemployed (Coordination nationale de défense des droits des chômeurs, CNDDC).

On the same day, 40 contract teachers, along with the president and the general secretary of the Contract Teachers’ National Council (a SNAPAP affiliate), were also arrested at a sit-in held in front of the Presidency of the Republic in Algiers to call for the granting of tenure. All were released later that day without being charged.

This kind of arrests has become recurrent against some union activists who are the targets of constant harassment by police and by the judicial authorities. Both Ms Fallil and Mr Belabès had already been arrested on 22 February at a demonstration that took place in front of the Palais des Expositions inAlgiers, where they tried to question the Minister of labour and the spokesman of the President of the Republic Belkhadem Abdelaziz, about the rights of unemployed and casual workers. Both had also been hounded for their participation in demonstrations in favour of economic and social rights in 2011 as well as other union activists.

Another example of harassment is that of Hadj Aïssa Abbas and Mohamed Seddik Bouamer, representatives of the CNDDC branch in Laghouat, 400 km south ofAlgiers. On 18 January 2012, the two men were sentenced in trial court to 18 months in jail for ‘demonstrating in a public place’ (art. 297-298 of the Penal Code) after having taken part in a peaceful demonstration in favour of the rights of unemployed workers in August 2011 in Laghouat. The Laghouat court’s decision was made without the accused being present, since they had not been summoned. They are opposing the in absentia judgment. This severe sentence sends a clear and disturbing message to union leaders and human rights defenders calling for recognition of the right to work and the right to decent living conditions.

Our organizations strongly condemn this harassment of Algerian human rights defenders. They point out that, according to article 1 of the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Defenders, ‘everyone has the right, individually and in association with others, to promote and to strive for the protection and realization of human rights and fundamental freedoms at the national and international levels’.

Our organizations urge the Algerian government to bring all acts of harassment to an end and to comply in every respect with the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders and with the international and regional instruments for the protection of human rights that have been ratified byAlgeria.

EMHRN has already noted in its latest report – entitled Lifting the State ofEmergency: A Game of Smoke and Mirrors. The Status of Freedom of Association, Assembly and Demonstration in Algeria1 – that the repeal of the state of emergency was only a game of smoke and mirrors. This measure only served to conceal the fact that barriers to the enjoyment of public and individual freedoms, as well as human rights violations, have become even more relentless than before and that most of the restrictive measures in place during the state of emergency have simply been incorporated into regular laws.

Contacts:
EMHRN: Hayet Zeghiche: +32 2 503 06 86
FIDH: Karine Appy / Arthur Manet: +33 1 43 55 25 18
OMCT: Delphine Reculeau: +41 22 809 49 39
CFDA: +33 1 43 44 87 82
LADDH: +213 21 23 80 86
SNAPAP: +213 21 52 03 72
CIHRS: + 202 27963757
 

European Commission weighs options to break the ‛glass ceiling’ for women on company boards

A European Commission report published on 5 March 2012 shows that limited progress towards increasing the number of women on company boards has been achieved one year after EU Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding called for credible self-regulatory measures (see MEMO/11/124). Just one in seven board members atEurope’s top firms is a woman (13.7%). This is a slight improvement from 11.8% in 2010. However, it would still take more than 40 years to reach a significant gender balance (at least 40% of both sexes) at this rate.

Gender balance in top positions has been shown to contribute to better business performance, improved competitiveness and economic gains. For example, a report by McKinsey found that gender-balanced companies have a 56% higher operating profit compared to male-only companies. Ernst & Young looked at the 290 largest publicly-listed companies. They found that the earnings at companies with at least one woman on the board were significantly higher than in those that had no female board member.

To identify appropriate measures for addressing the persistent lack of gender diversity in boardrooms of listed companies inEurope, the Commission launched a public consultation today. The Commission is seeking views on possible action at EU level, including legislative measures, to redress the gender imbalance on company boards. The public consultation will run until 28 May 2012. Following this input, the Commission will take a decision on further action later this year.

Today’s report on gender balance on company boards comes one year after EU Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding challenged publicly-listed companies in Europe to voluntarily increase the number of women in their boardrooms by signing the ‘Women on the Board Pledge for Europe’. By signing this Pledge, companies commit themselves to raise female representation on their boards to 30% by 2015 and 40% by 2020. However, during the past 12 months, only 24 companies acrossEuropehave signed the Pledge.

“One year ago, I asked companies to voluntarily increase women’s presence on corporate boards. My call was supported by the European Parliament and forwarded to business organisations by Ministers of Employment, Social Affairs and Gender Equality in many EU Member States. However, I regret to see that despite our calls, self-regulation so far has not brought about satisfactory results,” said Viviane Reding, Vice-President of the European Commission and the EU’s Justice Commissioner. “The lack of women in top jobs in the business world harmsEurope’s competitiveness and hampers economic growth. This is why several EU Member States – notablyBelgium, France,Italy, theNetherlands and Spain– have started to address the situation by adopting legislation that introduces gender quotas for company boards. Some countries –Denmark, Finland, Greece, Austria and Slovenia– have adopted rules on gender balance for the boards of state-owned companies. Personally, I am not a great fan of quotas. However, I like the results they bring. I also note that businesses operating across borders in the internal market may have to comply with different national quota laws if they want to participate in tenders for public works. This is why the Commission’s Legislative Work Programme for 2012 includes an initiative to address this situation. Today, I am inviting the public – individual businesses, the social partners, interested NGOs and citizens – to comment on what kind of measures the EU should take to tackle the lack of gender diversity in boardrooms. I believe it is high time that Europe breaks the glass ceiling that continues to bar female talent from getting to the top inEurope’s listed companies. I will work closely with the European Parliament and allMemberStatesto bring about change.”

Progress on improving the gender balance inEurope’s boardrooms over the past year has been the best for a long time (a 1.9-percentage point increase from October 2010 to January 2012, compared to a long-term average rise over the last decade of 0.6 percentage points per year). This increase can be attributed to calls from the Commission and European Parliament (MEMO/11/487) and a number of national legislative initiatives. France, which introduced legislation on gender balance in boards in 2011, alone accounts for around half the increase in the EU. But overall, change remains stubbornly slow. The number of women chairing major company boards has even declined, falling to 3.2% in January 2012 from 3.4% in 2010.

People in Europe clearly agree that this situation should be changed: 88% of Europeans believe given equal competences women should be equally represented in the top jobs in business, according to a new Eurobarometer survey published today (see Annex). Meanwhile, 76% of Europeans believe women have the necessary skills. Finally, 75% of those asked are in favour of legislation on gender balance in company boards with the relative majority of respondents (49%) saying that monetary fines would be the most appropriate mechanism to enforce such legislation (see Annex).

Background

A growing body of evidence points to significant economic benefits from a better gender balance in economic decision-making (see today’s Commission report). Having more women in top jobs can contribute to a more productive and innovative working environment and improved company performance overall. This bolsters competitiveness. Women account for 60% of new university graduates but few make it to the top of companies. Opening the door to senior positions acts as an incentive for women to enter and stay in the workforce, helping to raise female employment rates and making better use of women’s potential as human resources. “If we want to achieve the target set by the Europe 2020 Strategy – the EU’s growth strategy – to raise the employment rate for women and men aged 20-64 to 75%, we need to make gender diversity a growth asset,” said Commission Vice-President Viviane Reding.

Promoting more equality in decision-making is one of the goals in the European Women’s Charter (see IP/10/237), which was initiated by President José Manuel Barroso and Vice-President Reding in March 2010. The Commission then followed these commitments by adopting a Gender Equality Strategy in September 2010 for the next five years (see IP/10/1149 and MEMO/10/430), which includes exploring targeted initiatives to get more women into top jobs in economic decision-making. The European Commission Work Programme for 2012 announces a legislative initiative on improving the gender balance in the companies listed on stock exchanges.

Today’s Commission report points out that while there have been some recent advances, particularly in countries that have introduced gender quotas, progress remains slow. There are also big differences between countries, with women making up 27% of boards in the largest Finnish companies and 26% inLatvia, but only 3% inMaltaand 4% inCyprus.

For more information
Women on boards report:
http://womenmed.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/women-on-boards_european-commission-2012.pdf
http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/12/213&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en

Leading Arab Women from 6 Middle East Countries to convene in New York at United Nations

Karama led delegation will address Women’s Rights and the Arab Spring and call on greater rights for women in the region

The Karama organization based inCairo,Egyptannounced today it is bringing a delegation of 15 women from six countries of the Middle East and North Africa to the 56th session of the Commission on the Status of Women from February 27 to March 4 at the United Nations Headquarters inNew York. Karama’s Founder and CEO Hibbaq Osman said, “Women represent fifty percent of the world’s population, yet our voices still aren’t being heard in the way they should be. Our delegation plans to shine light on crucial issues effecting women, and the role women can play in bridging the divide.”

Coming a year after the Arab Spring and uprisings and with Syria still in turmoil, the 15 member delegation will participate in and gain access at United Nations headquarters to the general discussion, high-level roundtables and 90 side events byMemberStatesand UN entities. Karama’s delegation will share strategic analysis and lessons learned at their one day conference, “The Challenges and Prospects of Gender Equality in the Context of the Arab Uprisings,” being held at the UN Plaza Hotel on March 2nd starting at 9am.

Women from Egypt, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia, Somalia and Sudan will make their case to international governments and UN authorities regarding the urgency and importance of increased support and investment in women’s rights in the region. Said Ms. Osman, “As we keep witnessing democratic reform means equal rights for women, and the same economic opportunity to long term stability and prosperity.” Karama’s delegation will provide national expertise to international stakeholders in order to inform their strategies, encourage local partnership, and ensure accountability or regional governments to international human rights and gender equality standards.

This conference comes at a time when women represent 40% of the waged workers of the world, yet in theMiddle Eastthey only make up 20% of the workforce, the lowest level of any region. In the wake of the global economic crisis, a growing unemployment rate for men is further limiting women’s pool of opportunities. Economic development and empowerment is a critical issue for growth and long term stability.

Karama has hosted diverse and dynamic delegations of high-level activists, parliamentarians, and diplomats annually for the last five years, raising the profile of Arab women in international arena as experts and leaders, leveraging their power to influence policymakers, educate international governments, and lobby for increased investment and support in priorities for women in the region.

Published February 28, 2012
http://www.timesunion.com/business/press-releases/article/Leading-Arab-Women-from-6-Middle-East-Countries-3367617.php

 

 

Fighting for Gender Equality in Iraq

As President Obama hailed the “extraordinary achievement” of U.S. troops withdrawing from Iraq in December, continuing protests against government repression and abysmal basic services undermined the narrative of a successful democratic transition. Yanar Mohammed, president of the Organization of Women’s Freedom in Iraq (OWFI), has for months helped many Iraqis express their anger. Since February 2011’s “Day of Iraqi Anger” – on which tens of thousands of Iraqis nationwide called for jobs, fair distribution ofIraq’s oil wealth and an end to occupation – Mohammed has helped organize weekly demonstrations in Baghdad’s Tahrir Square. She’s been a vocal critic of both the U.S.-led occupation and the fundamentalist groups that she says it has empowered.

On June 10, 2011, Mohammed and other OWFI activists were attacked and sexually assaulted while demonstrating. Despite continued threats and intimidation, she continues her work to defend Iraqi women from domestic abuse and sexual trafficking, and to promote women’s voices and demands in the struggle for a truly democratic Iraq. She spoke to In These Times in December fromToronto, where she was visiting family.

U.S.troops have withdrawn, yet as many as 5,000 private contractors remain. What is the importance of this moment for Iraqis?

We are unable to focus on the withdrawal because our insecurity has escalated. There are more bombings. And we are unable, after eight years, to figure out: What did we gain out of this occupation? We know what we have lost. We know theUnited Stateswas unable to put together a functioning government. We know that we have lost the elegance of our cities. Baghdad is totally ruined. We know that at this point the standard of life is so low and so expensive that a middle-class family cannot get by, cannot put healthy meals on the table.

Is the occupation continuing by other means?

Although U.S.troops withdrew, they have left us with a heavily militarized society. Almost 1 million Iraqi personnel have been recruited into the army and the security agencies. We are still living in a big military camp – the only difference is that they are wearing Iraqi military uniforms. We have almost 10 different kinds of security agencies – some of them are anti-riot, some of them are intelligence and some of them are private security groups. None of them feel like they need to be accountable.

How have things changed for Iraqi women since Saddam was overthrown?

Women’s status in the society is much worse. When Saddam was around, we had many objections, but the laws did grant some basic women’s rights. But after the so-called liberation, a girl can be married at 11 years. This is legal because the Iraqi Constitution has an article that says that Iraqis are free to choose what kind of law under which they lead their civil lives. Many American officials have called the Constitution the most democratic constitution in the Arab world, but how does an 11-year-old girl choose what kind of law protects her?

How did the OWFI Iraq get its start?

During the beginning of the occupation, I was living in Canada. In May 2003, I travelled to Iraq and met with some women, and we founded the OWFI. Our mission was to build a society of full equality for everybody under a secular, non-ethnic constitution. We started with a few volunteers. One of the volunteers was a young woman who was eloping, but under the threat of an honor killing. We gave her a room on the upper floor in the building, while we took the main floor for the organization. And so we started the first shelter for women in Iraq!

Our main shelter is in Baghdad now, but we have many families who have opened their houses for women who are under threat of honor killing, or who are escaping other kinds of abuse. OWFI defends women without compromising with anyone – not the tribal groups in Iraq who see women as property, not the religious groups who claim the political scene for themselves and not the nationalist groups, under whom we have lived our whole lives, who see men as the heroes of a society.

Do you consider yourself a feminist?

For sure. The kind of feminism I look at encourages equality – including when it comes to gender. Inequalities cannot thrive in the third millennium, and that’s why everybody is on the streets. Feminists, especially in the Arab world, have had a big say in these public squares of political struggle, because women are the face of political change.

Your organization recently issued a message of solidarity with Occupy Wall Street. The media talks about violence inIraqa great deal, but rarely inequality and rising unemployment. Is there a new 1% inIraq?

Although the U.S.troops are leaving, they have left us with a 1% of Iraqis who are ruling ruthlessly. A member of Parliament in Iraq receives annual compensation that is equivalent to $102,000, while a worker in the Iraqi public sector earns $200 or $300 as a beginning monthly salary. This is a society of inequality.

Unlike the revolutions in Egypt or Tunisia that were demanding the removal of a dictator, February’s mass demonstrations were targeting a government that was elected. What does this say about Iraqi democracy?

We are asked, “Why demonstrate against an elected government?” During the occupation, all the political and financial support went to the most right-wing groups in Iraq. The elections are the final result of the eight-year U.S. occupation.

The government announced before the demonstrations that there would be a curfew – they were terrified. Yet people came and demonstrated. Nobody was fighting against each other – there was no sectarian struggle in this square. But, the end of the day was different. The armies, security groups and anti-riot troops surrounded us, and they began shooting. It did not feel that it was a democratic country at all. On Fridays, people still go. But if you go to demonstrate in Tahrir Square [in central Baghdad], Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has his militias around the square ready to pick you up.

OWFI members have been beaten and sexually assaulted while demonstrating, just like female protesters in Egypt. Why are women targeted in this way?

They wanted us to feel ashamed. Our organization made sure that these demonstrations had a female face. We had our slogans, our banners, which we carried every single Friday. This was not approved by al-Maliki’s government. And in an Arab society, if a woman is shamed, she is pushed out of the public arena. They expected that we would go hide in our homes and not show our faces to anybody. The same way in which women are forced to immolate themselves or made the victim of an honor killing, they wanted to force a political dishonoring on us in order to end us politically.

How are the women who have been attacked inTahrir Square faring today?

All of them are back in the square. But we are very careful as to our whereabouts. Once we see security forces, we leave the square. We are not willing to be tortured again and again.

Are you working to get women elected directly to Parliament?

In Iraq, 25 percent of members of Parliament are required to be women, which is good. But more than half the women in Parliament are from the Religious Right. When we were beaten inTahrir Square– 25 of us – not a single female Parliamentarian spoke out. In other words, those women are puppets.

You have been threatened with assassination. Why do you continue doing this work?

The government is threatening not to renew our registration as an organization. But I always remember the eyes of the young women in our shelter who are given a second chance in life because they just escaped an honor killing that was forced upon them because they were raped, or because they were harassed. This second chance to life for women is important. I will never let go of this mandate, whether I am beaten or declared illegal by some corrupt prime minister. The American occupation put all the resources ofIraqin the hands of the misogynists. Feminists can bring a better future inIraq. And we are waiting to hear from the feminists of the United States, from progressives, from everybody. We want you to help us gain the upper hand in Iraq.

By Rebecca Burns
Published on 7 February 2012 in These Times
http://inthesetimes.com/article/12583/fighting_for_gender_equality_in_iraq/

 

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.